🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.